Is this a consulting service?

No, this is a free, interactive software tool that calculates your potential liability under the DPDP Act 2023 in 30 seconds. It provides an instant risk score and automated action plan.

What are common DPDP violations in Incident Communications Data Audit?

Common violations include: Including excessive personal data (e.g., full names, addresses, account numbers) in breach notification emails or public statements, beyond what's strictly necessary for the Data Principal to understand the incident., Not securing internal incident communication channels (e.g., dedicated Slack channels, shared drives) leading to unauthorised access to breach details or sensitive data., Failing to maintain an auditable log of all incident communications sent, received, and access controls for these communications, making it impossible to prove due diligence to the Data Protection Board..

The DPDP Audit Tool

Compliance for Incident Communications Data Audit

🚨

Incident Communications Data Audit
Liability Check

🔒

When a data breach hits, your incident communications can either save you or sink you. Mismanaging personal data in breach notifications or internal comms can trigger fresh DPDP penalties, even adding to the initial breach fine.

Why Incident Communications Data Audit is at Risk

Under DPDP Act 2023, how you communicate during a data incident is critical. Disclosing **more personal data than necessary** in public statements, internal updates, or even emails to affected Data Principals can be seen as a secondary data breach. Imagine a breach at a fintech company in BKC, and an internal memo with customer details leaks to the press – that’s a new violation. You must maintain strict access controls over communications channels (e.g., Slack, email, external PR tools), ensure only authorised personnel can draft and send updates, and rigorously preserve all evidence related to the breach and your communication strategy for the Data Protection Board's scrutiny.

Common Violations

1.Including excessive personal data (e.g., full names, addresses, account numbers) in breach notification emails or public statements, beyond what's strictly necessary for the Data Principal to understand the incident.
2.Not securing internal incident communication channels (e.g., dedicated Slack channels, shared drives) leading to unauthorised access to breach details or sensitive data.
3.Failing to maintain an auditable log of all incident communications sent, received, and access controls for these communications, making it impossible to prove due diligence to the Data Protection Board.

The Immediate Fix

Conduct an urgent audit of all existing incident communication templates and protocols. Ensure they explicitly prohibit the sharing of excessive personal data and establish clear access controls for drafting, approving, and sending breach-related updates. Train your comms team on DPDP data minimisation principles for incident response.